WebbThe publication of The Osteological Paradox (Wood et al., 1992, Current Anthropology, 33:343–370) a decade ago sparked debate about the methods and conclusions drawn from bioarchaeological research. WebbWe demonstrate how the concurrent use of multiple analytical techniques and life history theory can engage the osteological paradox and provide salient insights into the study of stress, frailty, and resilience in past populations.

Examining the osteological paradox: Skeletal stress in mass …

Webb3 jan. 2003 · The publication of The Osteological Paradox (Wood et al., 1992, Current Anthropology, 33:343–370) a decade ago sparked debate about the methods and … WebbThe publication of The Osteological Paradox (Wood et al., 1992, Current Anthropology, 33:343–370) a decade ago sparked debate about the methods and conclusions drawn … inertia and angular velocity

The Osteological Paradox Student Research Proceedings

WebbIn 1992, the osteological paradox was first introduced by Wood et al. It considers the difficulties with extrapolating statistics from an archaeological skeletal collection to health status of these populations for paleodemography and paleopathology. Most research presupposes that the individual risk of a certain 64 Webb1 sep. 2001 · The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology 2012 TLDR Concerns concerning how DISH must be viewed through the lens of the osteological paradox are explored, particularly relating to selective mortality and heterogeneity of frailty are explored. 3 PDF Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: clinical features and … Webb1 dec. 1994 · The Osteological Paradox is reviewed, finding the paper is often cited but infrequently engaged in a meaningful way, and four areas of fruitful research are identified: intrasite, contextual perspectives, subadults, associating stress markers with demographic phenomena, and skeletal lesion-formation processes. Expand 186 PDF Save Alert log into knust virtual classroom