site stats

S v mintoor 1996 1 sacr 514 c

SpletSee the debate on the characteristics of electricity in S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) and S v Ndebele 2012 (1) SACR 245 (GSJ), discussed in Burchell Principles op cit (n3) at … Splet01. jan. 2006 · Disclosure. The authors confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed.

South African Cases Archive Centre for Child Law

http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECGHC/2016/49.pdf Splet(c) In Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) it was held that electricity cannot be stolen. Decide which of the above statements is/are correct. The easiest way to do this is to look what … eyes in the night movie https://h2oceanjet.com

S v Tau 1996 2 SACR 97 T.pdf - IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH.

http://www.saflii.austlii.edu.au/za/cases/ZASCA/toc-B.html SpletIn S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SA SACR 514 (C), a magistrate had found the accused guilty of the theft of 901 units of electricity from the Bredasdorp Municipality. On review, the Court set the conviction aside on the basis that electricity could not be regarded as a thing which could form the subject of a charge of theft at common law. Splet01. maj 2012 · In S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) it was held that electricity is an energy and is incapable of theft. The three accused in the Ndebele case faced a large number of charges relating to manipulation of vending machines dispensing electricity credit vouchers, including charges of electricity theft. eyes in the park

During May 2024, Mr Tatana is arrested and charged with a …

Category:Re-Positioning the Law of Theft in View Of Recent

Tags:S v mintoor 1996 1 sacr 514 c

S v mintoor 1996 1 sacr 514 c

criminal law b - Rhodes University

SpletThe accused's lawyer referred to the case of S v Mintoor and argued, inter alia, that the charges of theft of electricity should be quashed because "electricity was not capable of theft". 23 The State argued that the court should develop the common law and rule that theft of electricity was an offence at common law. SpletIn S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SA SACR 514 (C), a magistrate had found the accused guilty of the theft of 901 units of electricity from the Bredasdorp Municipality. On review, the Court set …

S v mintoor 1996 1 sacr 514 c

Did you know?

SpletS v Van den Berg 1996 (1) SACR 19 (N). S v Zoko 1983 (1) SA 871 (N) at 875C. Secretary for Inland Revenue v Cadac Engineering 1965 (2) SA (A) Solicitor-General v Malgas 1918 AD 489. V and T v UK (Application No. 24888/94, 4 December 1998). Venter v S (SCA case no 381/97 of 7 Sept 1999). SpletIn S v Mintoor 1996 1 SACR 514 (C), … it was held that electricity is an energy and that energy is incapable of theft. … It was submitted that I should consider developing the common law to encompass energy as a thing capable of theft. In my view, I do not have to do so and I do not deal further with this issue.” Clearly it is

Splettrias politica (vide S v Augustine 1986 (3) SA 294 (C) at 3021-J; S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) at 517a-b; S v Malgas 2001 (2) SA 1222 (SCA) at 1226D; S v De Vicenzo 2003 (3) … Splet29. mar. 2024 · This article's main goal is to examine and identify weaknesses in our legal system, South African criminal law, and how it should be applied to crimes involving theft …

http://www.saflii.austlii.edu.au/za/cases/ZASCA/toc-B.html SpletS v Mintoor 1996 1 SACR 514 (C) S.A. Legislation : Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 : Electricity Act 41 of 1987 s. 27 (2) Subject : Electricity theft This item appears in the following Collection (s) iSalpi [27431]

Splet1996 (1) SACR 434 (E) Issue: Child witness-intermediary procedure. S v Mathebula Reference: 1996 (2) SACR 231 (T) Issue: Child witness-intermediary procedure. Cases: …

SpletHowever in the case of R v Mavros 166 the court held that property also includes rights that others have in that property.167 The Court stated in S v Mtetwa 168 that “in regard to the crime 162 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C). 163 See in general Snyman Criminal Law (2002) 535 et seq. All the South African cases deal with some form of corporeal property. does backbone work with iphone 14SpletProperty - things capable of being stolen: i) Movable ii) Corporeal not: design or idea R v Cheeseborough 1948 (3) SA 756 (T) Board and lodging - R v Renaud 1922 CPD 322 Electricity / energy S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C). [Electricity Act 41 of 1987 creates offence] Computer software programme through copying eyes in the sky keep railways clearSpletCompare S v Raphatle 1995 (2) SACR 452 (T); S v Manyonoyo 1996 (11) BCLR 1463 (E); S v Lewies 1998 (1) SACR 101 (C) at 104a-c. [12] In S v Maluleke (2) SACR 577 (T) at 582e-h Webster J stated as follows: “[12] The consequences of failing to comply with the provisions of s 303 have not, from the limited research I could undertake ... eyes in the sky tabooSplet01. jan. 2006 · Disclosure. The authors confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the … does back child support affect creditSpletA person commits theft if he unlawfully and intentionally appropriates movable, corporeal property which: a) belongs to and is in the possession of another; b) belongs to another but is in the perpetrators own possession; or c) belongs to the perpetrator but is in anothers possession and such other person has a right to possess it which legally … does back brace help lower back painSpletA person commits theft if he unlawfully and intentionally appropriates movable, corporeal property which: a) belongs to and is in the possession of another; b) belongs to another … eyes in the sky camerasSpletTABLE OF CASES SOUTH AFRICA R v Abbass 1916 AD 233 R v Abelson 1933 TPD 277 S v Abrahams 1997 (2) SACR 47 (C) S v Adams 1959 (1) SA 646 (P) S v Adriantos 1965 (3) SA 436 (A) S v Aimes 1998 (1) SACR 343 (C) R v Anthony 1938 TPD 602 S v AR Wholesalers 1975 (1) SA 551 (NC) R v Baartman and Others 1960 (3) SA 535 (A) S v Baloyi 1978 (3) … does back child support ever go away